severity 160579 important
thanks
Steve Langasek wrote:
> 160579 amounts to "a user can do stupid things that will expose his
> password, like typing them into the URL bar";
I disagree here because that's not actually the bug: it's documented
that storing your password in a (bookmarked) URL is pos
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:42:04PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 16:22 +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > I looked for the first for several hours but didn't find it, looks
> > like you're more apt at maintaining that package than I am. So, yes,
> > adopt it if you feel
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> tags 160579 +patch
> thanks
>
> Hello Slashcode maintainer,
>
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 22:31:39 +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > Please investigate, correspond with upstream and fix this bug.
>
> We're now nearly four years later and
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 16:22 +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> I looked for the first for several hours but didn't find it, looks
> like you're more apt at maintaining that package than I am. So, yes,
> adopt it if you feel so.
Thanks for your response. I'm not interested in adopting it - I'm
i
tags 160579 +patch
thanks
Hello Slashcode maintainer,
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 22:31:39 +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Please investigate, correspond with upstream and fix this bug.
We're now nearly four years later and there's been zero action. So I
decided to take a look at this package and found the
5 matches
Mail list logo