[Mark Eichin]
> For a time-boxed effort, I believe 256 is better than 128 (RFC-1035
> defines the limit in terms of wire-encoding of the DNS message rather
> than the user-visible values (section 3.1, "To simplify
> implementations") - there's also a 63 byte limit for "labels" but that's
> just a s
For a time-boxed effort, I believe 256 is better than 128 (RFC-1035
defines the limit in terms of wire-encoding of the DNS message rather
than the user-visible values (section 3.1, "To simplify
implementations") - there's also a 63 byte limit for "labels" but that's
just a single name-part and does
[Mark W. Eichin 2002-08-06]
> I list a hostname of
> krb5-verify-init-creds-opt-set-ap-req-nofail.krbtest.com
> in my .sntoprc. strace shows that sntop silently trucates this, and
> fails, running
I do not know the code, but had a look and suspect the limit is set
using the IN_BUF define. Here
3 matches
Mail list logo
