Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/282
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:28:53AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Here's a first stab at it just to get the ball rolling:
>
> 2.x time64 ABI transition
> ~
>
> All architectures
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:28:53AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 01:14:07AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >> I see no explicit mention of the time64 transition. I think this should
> >> be documented because the transition involved a no-SONAME-re
Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 01:14:07AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> I see no explicit mention of the time64 transition. I think this should
>> be documented because the transition involved a no-SONAME-rename which
>> means we broke the involved architectures ABI, where we
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 01:14:07AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I see no explicit mention of the time64 transition. I think this should
> be documented because the transition involved a no-SONAME-rename which
> means we broke the involved architectures ABI, where we protected the
> archive from th
Package: release-notes
Hi!
I see no explicit mention of the time64 transition. I think this should
be documented because the transition involved a no-SONAME-rename which
means we broke the involved architectures ABI, where we protected the
archive from that breakage via packaging metadata. But fo
5 matches
Mail list logo
