On 2025-05-10 Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> Am 10.05.25 um 11:31 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
>> It is a no-op, SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is exactly
>> the date from debian/changelog
> If that is true, why does SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH change on a binNMU, which
> was the reason for this bug?
Hello Bastia
Hi Andreas,
Am 10.05.25 um 11:31 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
It is a no-op, SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is exactly
the date from debian/changelog
If that is true, why does SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH change on a binNMU, which was the
reason for this bug?
Thanks,
Bastian
On 2025-05-08 Bastian Germann wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
> I am uploading a NMU to fix this. I have based my changes on the last
> git commit, so it includes additional changes.
> diff -Nru autogen-5.18.16/debian/changelog autogen-5.18.16/debian/changelog
> --- autogen-5.18.16/debian/change
Control: tags -1 patch
I am uploading a NMU to fix this. I have based my changes on the last
git commit, so it includes additional changes.
diff -Nru autogen-5.18.16/debian/changelog autogen-5.18.16/debian/changelog
--- autogen-5.18.16/debian/changelog2022-05-24 19:13:45.0 +0200
+++ au
4 matches
Mail list logo