Bug#1103033: dh-elpa: Handle version of built-in package better

2025-04-13 Thread Xiyue Deng
Sean Whitton writes: > [...] >> >> (Wondering for the situation that Emacs version A provides foo 1.0, and >> when foo 1.0 founds a security issue, and Emacs version A+deb12u1 fixes >> it by providing foo 1.1, will foo 1.0 automatically upgrade to Emacs >> A+deb12u1, or it still requires user man

Bug#1103033: dh-elpa: Handle version of built-in package better

2025-04-13 Thread Sean Whitton
control: reassign -1 src:emacs control: retitle -1 emacs: generate versioned Provides for all :core packages Hello, On Sun 13 Apr 2025 at 08:55pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Option 1 also sounds good to me. Cool. I'm not planning to work on it but I can review patches. > This may also be useful

Bug#1103033: dh-elpa: Handle version of built-in package better

2025-04-13 Thread Xiyue Deng
Sean Whitton writes: > Hello, > > On Sun 13 Apr 2025 at 06:28pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > >> Package: dh-elpa >> Version: 2.1.9 >> Severity: wishlist >> >> A recent bug#1101304 shows some limitation of version handling of >> dh-elpa for packages that are both built-in and packaged separately. >> C

Bug#1103033: dh-elpa: Handle version of built-in package better

2025-04-13 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sun 13 Apr 2025 at 06:28pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Package: dh-elpa > Version: 2.1.9 > Severity: wishlist > > A recent bug#1101304 shows some limitation of version handling of > dh-elpa for packages that are both built-in and packaged separately. > Currently, dh-elpa can mark a package

Bug#1103033: dh-elpa: Handle version of built-in package better

2025-04-13 Thread Xiyue Deng
Package: dh-elpa Version: 2.1.9 Severity: wishlist A recent bug#1101304 shows some limitation of version handling of dh-elpa for packages that are both built-in and packaged separately. Currently, dh-elpa can mark a package as packaged separately, and then detect the version from an addon comment