Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-05-05 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:05:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Noah, > > On 26-04-2025 10:03, Paul Gevers wrote: > > For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending): > > 1104047. > > > Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests (filing > bugs and

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-27 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:05:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending): > > 1104047. > > Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests (filing > bugs and/or providing patches). It seems that the new dovecot requi

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Noah, On 26-04-2025 10:03, Paul Gevers wrote: For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending): 1104047. Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests (filing bugs and/or providing patches). It seems that the new dovecot requires an update to co

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi On 24-04-2025 18:20, Paul Gevers wrote: With both of the issues out of the way, go ahead. For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending): 1104047. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-24 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi, On 24-04-2025 18:13, Noah Meyerhans wrote: It's likely my fault for not highlighting the unusual nature of dovecot when filing the bug. I could have asked earlier. I did notify the maintainer privately, before realizing that they seem MIA, but didn't follow u

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-24 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Sorry taking so long to reply. I assumed because you filed a transition bug > that there was a regular SONAME bump involved. It's likely my fault for not highlighting the unusual nature of dovecot when filing the bug. > I see that th

Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-24 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Noah, Sorry taking so long to reply. I assumed because you filed a transition bug that there was a regular SONAME bump involved. I see that the dovecot-core ships libraries, but it looks like they didn't bump SONAME. So how is this supposed to work in the dovecot ecosystem? Isn't the packa

Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-17 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:11:34PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > Do you have any upstream statement how they will handle the 2.3.y > > series after their 2.4 release? Do they plan to still backport CVE > > fixes for the 2.3 series or is it considered officially end of life? > > > > It so we mig

Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-16 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 07:47:19PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > > I'd very much like to include dovecot 2.4.1 with the trixie release. > > That would be excellent. I also missed the freeze cutoff with > dovecot-fts-flatcurve (xapian based IMAP search), but 2.4 includes this > plugin already! > >

Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-16 Thread Daniel Gröber
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:54:08PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > Yes, we'll be able to remove that package from trixie if we get dovecot > updated. Just to clarify: dovecot-fts-flatcurve didn't make it to testing since the upload came a day too late despite getting super fast NEW processing >_<.

Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-16 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Noah, On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:16:34AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > I'd very much like to include dovecot 2.4.1 with the trixie release. That would be excellent. I also missed the freeze cutoff with dovecot-fts-flatcurve (xapian based IMAP search), but 2.4 includes this plugin already! I

Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-16 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 09:34:24PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Do you have any upstream statement how they will handle the 2.3.y > series after their 2.4 release? Do they plan to still backport CVE > fixes for the 2.3 series or is it considered officially end of life? > > It so we might b

Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Noah, [disclaimer, not part of the release team, but asking the questions with security-teams view on this request] On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:16:34AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unbloc

Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-03-31 Thread Noah Meyerhans
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: dove...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:dovecot Hi release team. I opened a transition request for dovecot a couple of weeks ago, but figure it might be ignored