On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:05:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> On 26-04-2025 10:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending):
> > 1104047.
>
>
> Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests (filing
> bugs and
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:05:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending):
> > 1104047.
>
> Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests (filing
> bugs and/or providing patches). It seems that the new dovecot requi
Hi Noah,
On 26-04-2025 10:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending):
1104047.
Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests
(filing bugs and/or providing patches). It seems that the new dovecot
requires an update to co
Hi
On 24-04-2025 18:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
With both of the issues out of the way, go ahead.
For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending):
1104047.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 18:13, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
It's likely my fault for not highlighting the unusual nature of dovecot
when filing the bug.
I could have asked earlier.
I did notify the maintainer privately, before realizing that they seem
MIA, but didn't follow u
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Sorry taking so long to reply. I assumed because you filed a transition bug
> that there was a regular SONAME bump involved.
It's likely my fault for not highlighting the unusual nature of dovecot
when filing the bug.
> I see that th
Hi Noah,
Sorry taking so long to reply. I assumed because you filed a transition
bug that there was a regular SONAME bump involved. I see that the
dovecot-core ships libraries, but it looks like they didn't bump SONAME.
So how is this supposed to work in the dovecot ecosystem? Isn't the
packa
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:11:34PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > Do you have any upstream statement how they will handle the 2.3.y
> > series after their 2.4 release? Do they plan to still backport CVE
> > fixes for the 2.3 series or is it considered officially end of life?
> >
> > It so we mig
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 07:47:19PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > I'd very much like to include dovecot 2.4.1 with the trixie release.
>
> That would be excellent. I also missed the freeze cutoff with
> dovecot-fts-flatcurve (xapian based IMAP search), but 2.4 includes this
> plugin already!
>
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:54:08PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Yes, we'll be able to remove that package from trixie if we get dovecot
> updated.
Just to clarify: dovecot-fts-flatcurve didn't make it to testing since the
upload came a day too late despite getting super fast NEW processing >_<.
Hi Noah,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:16:34AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> I'd very much like to include dovecot 2.4.1 with the trixie release.
That would be excellent. I also missed the freeze cutoff with
dovecot-fts-flatcurve (xapian based IMAP search), but 2.4 includes this
plugin already!
I
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 09:34:24PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Do you have any upstream statement how they will handle the 2.3.y
> series after their 2.4 release? Do they plan to still backport CVE
> fixes for the 2.3 series or is it considered officially end of life?
>
> It so we might b
Hi Noah,
[disclaimer, not part of the release team, but asking the questions
with security-teams view on this request]
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:16:34AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unbloc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: dove...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dovecot
Hi release team. I opened a transition request for dovecot a couple of weeks
ago, but figure it might be ignored
14 matches
Mail list logo