Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-05-05 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:05:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Noah, > > On 26-04-2025 10:03, Paul Gevers wrote: > > For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending): > > 1104047. > > > Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests (filing > bugs and

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-27 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:05:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending): > > 1104047. > > Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests (filing > bugs and/or providing patches). It seems that the new dovecot requi

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Noah, On 26-04-2025 10:03, Paul Gevers wrote: For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending): 1104047. Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests (filing bugs and/or providing patches). It seems that the new dovecot requires an update to co

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi On 24-04-2025 18:20, Paul Gevers wrote: With both of the issues out of the way, go ahead. For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending): 1104047. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-24 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi, On 24-04-2025 18:13, Noah Meyerhans wrote: It's likely my fault for not highlighting the unusual nature of dovecot when filing the bug. I could have asked earlier. I did notify the maintainer privately, before realizing that they seem MIA, but didn't follow u

Bug#1100698: Bug#1101757: unblock: dovecot/1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1

2025-04-24 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Sorry taking so long to reply. I assumed because you filed a transition bug > that there was a regular SONAME bump involved. It's likely my fault for not highlighting the unusual nature of dovecot when filing the bug. > I see that th