On Friday, 18 April 2025 11:34:55 Central European Summer Time you wrote:
> I found the answer which is yes.
I was wrong.
The problems comes from all raku modules package which are Architecture: any.
(sigh.. they used to be arch all).
Anyway, all these packages (19) must be removed from all arm
On Friday, 18 April 2025 10:38:40 Central European Summer Time
domi.dum...@free.fr wrote:
> Weird thing is that I requested removal from testing, but the bug reports
> show that they were removed from unstable. Should I log other bugs to
> remove these packages from testing ?
I found the answer w
On Friday, 18 April 2025 09:24:52 Central European Summer Time Martin
Hostettler wrote:
> This mail will bump the autoremoval date a bit in to the future,
Thanks
> but please note that due to the current freeze status, removal from
> trixie will likely be permanent if it is going through.
Uh, o
I just want to give a heads up that:
> Version 2024.09+dfsg-3 of moarvm is marked for autoremoval
> from testing on Tue 22 Apr 2025.
>
> The removal of moarvm will also cause the removal of (transitive)
> reverse dependencies:
> dh-raku, nqp, prove6, raku, raku-file-find, raku-file-which,
> rak
Source: moarvm
Version: 2024.09+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2024.09+dfsg-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 3
5 matches
Mail list logo
