> > A ben file already exists
> > but it is broken (it reports that all packages are "bad").
> Why do you think that it is broken? Shouldn't packages be marked bad
> until they have been rebuilt?
Thanks for your explanations, and sorry for the noise. The packages
have been rebuilt *in experiment
Hi Nicolas
I've scheduled binNMUs of music123 and topal.
There was a team upload of phcpack instead.
I have not yet scheduled the binNMU of alire. As per the tracker, it
has a build-dependency on libgnatcoll, which has not yet been uploaded
to unstable.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: retitle -1 transition: gnat
Control: affects -1 = src:gnat
Hi Nicolas
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 19:35, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> All seems ready then.
Great! Please go ahead.
Regards
Graham
Hi Nicholas
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 08:21, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> A ben file already exists
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-14.html
> but it is broken (it reports that all packages are "bad").
Why do you think that it is broken? Shouldn't packages be marked bad
until the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: gcc...@packages.debian.org, Graham Inggs
Control: affects -1 + src:gcc-14
Hello.
This bug tracks the libgnat-14 transition.
In unstable and testing, Ada packages depend on
5 matches
Mail list logo
