Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-13 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > In that spirit, please find a third one, which fail with both libc, > but in a different way. > > About 10% of the time, it hangs in 'exit' after all threads have terminated. (This is an aside to this bug report, but is better to

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:29:46PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32782 > > Hi Bill, > > > > I join a simplified test-case. > > Thanks, I have been able to simplify it a tiny bit more, please find it > attached. It's the versi

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32782 Hi Bill, On 2025-03-11 09:12, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I also noticed it failed the same way on arm64. > > Thanks for confirming! > > > > > Please tell

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however > > if > > there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue much worse. > > Hello Aurélie

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however > > if > > there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue much worse. > > Hello Aurélie

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi Bill, On 2025-03-10 18:48, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, > > > however if > > > there is, it is

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2025-03-10 21:55, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On 2025-03-10 18:48, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 09:12:15AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I also noticed it failed the same way on arm64. > > Thanks for confirming! > > > > > Please tell me if you would like me to do more experiments. > > > > > > If yo

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I also noticed it failed the same way on arm64. Thanks for confirming! > > > Please tell me if you would like me to do more experiments. > > > > If you have time, yes, that's very useful. I'll also try to have a > > closer look at

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-10 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however if > there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue much worse. Hello Aurélien, I have made some progress. I have made a test program that does not use PAR

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-09 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.41-7 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hello Aurelien, > > > > During a test build pari FTBFS due to a test-suite failure in a test > > involvin

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2025-03-06 19:03, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Package: libc6 > > > Version: 2.41-7 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Hello Aurelien, > > > > > > During a test bui

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 02:17:46PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:50:35AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Hi Bill, > > > > > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > Package: libc6 > > > >

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:17:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > It's what I was currently doing. I found that the issue is caused by this > upstream commit: > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=89b53077d2a58f00e7debdfe58afabe953dac60d > > This is the corresponding bug that got fi

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.41-7 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hello Aurelien, > > > > During a test build pari FTBFS due to a test-suite failure in a test > > involvin

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:17:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2025-03-06 19:03, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > > > Do you have more details about that? I have tried to build pari locally, > > > and it builds fine. On which architecture is that? In which version? > > > > Is there a way to do

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:50:35AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Package: libc6 > > > Version: 2.41-7 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Hello Aurelien, > > > >

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi Bill, On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.41-7 > Severity: normal > > Hello Aurelien, > > During a test build pari FTBFS due to a test-suite failure in a test > involving pthread. > this failure is only reproducible with libc6 2.41. Do you have more deta

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-05 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.41-7 Severity: normal Hello Aurelien, During a test build pari FTBFS due to a test-suite failure in a test involving pthread. this failure is only reproducible with libc6 2.41. So I wonder if this is linked to the fix for 986724. pari uses condition variables. Of cou