Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 21-04-2025 13:15, Daniel Baumann wrote: I though filling the RC bug against harlequin right after it left NEW would be enough to never let harlequin-* migrate, seems not. Sorry about the confusion it caused. harlequin-* in testing don't depend on harlequin, so blocking harlequin didn'

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 4/21/25 12:13, Paul Gevers wrote: So they should have never made it to testing. yes. I though filling the RC bug against harlequin right after it left NEW would be enough to never let harlequin-* migrate, seems not. Sorry about the confusion it caused. Regards, Daniel

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 21-04-2025 11:58, Daniel Baumann wrote: harlequin-* are the database connection plugins and useless without harelquin itself. So they should have never made it to testing. The autoremoval is correct (which was my intention with their depends to harlequin, so that they in turn also do

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 4/21/25 10:36, Paul Gevers wrote: From src:harlequin point of view, this is fine I guess. But from src:harlequin-odbc there is a problem, see bug #1102694. harlequin-* are the database connection plugins and useless without harelquin itself. The autoremoval is correct (which was my inten

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Daniel, On 21-04-2025 10:09, Daniel Baumann wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 10:22:02 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Do you mean it depends on it, but it doesn't Depends on it? yes - harlequin depends on the python parts of apache arrow which is not packaged for Debian yet. I didn't add a non-exi

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 10:22:02 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Do you mean it depends on it, but it doesn't Depends on it? yes - harlequin depends on the python parts of apache arrow which is not packaged for Debian yet. I didn't add a non-existing package name to Depends but instead chose to immed

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 07:25:13 +0100 Daniel Baumann wrote: this is a reminder/blocker bug, that harlequin depends on pyarrow which isn't yet in Debian.. but I'm working on it. Do you mean it depends on it, but it doesn't Depends on it? I don't see it being blocked by a dependency not in testing.

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-03-03 Thread Daniel Baumann
Package: harlequin Severity: serious this is a reminder/blocker bug, that harlequin depends on pyarrow which isn't yet in Debian.. but I'm working on it. Regards, Daniel