On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:04:54PM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Thanks for the quick upload, Valentin! I kept triggering CI runs until
> one finally failed again, but didn't have the time to actually look at the
> logs. Udev losing the race against dpkg configuring a bunch of packages
> is rathe
Valentin Vidic writes:
> Ok, the latest failure has some interesting info:
>
> Mar 02 19:00:50 host (controld)[1803]: dlm.service: Referenced but unset
> environment variable evaluates to an empty string: DLM_CONTROLD_OPTS
> Mar 02 19:00:50 host dlm_controld[1803]: 32 dlm_controld 4.3.0 started
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 03:40:10PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Well, kernel-related packages cannot ignore the kernel, and this is why
> we have QEMU support so those get tested with the kernel from the same
> suite as the package being tested.
Ok, the latest failure has some interesting info
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:54:03PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Ferenc Wágner [250225 14:11]:
> > Valentin Vidic writes:
> > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 01:13:14PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > >
> > >> It appears the test is flaky, a retry passed:
> > >>
> > >> https://ci.debia
* Ferenc Wágner [250225 14:11]:
> Valentin Vidic writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 01:13:14PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> >
> >> It appears the test is flaky, a retry passed:
> >>
> >> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dlm/unstable/amd64/58083508/
> >>
> >> Please investigate and/or mar
Valentin Vidic writes:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 01:13:14PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
>> It appears the test is flaky, a retry passed:
>>
>> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dlm/unstable/amd64/58083508/
>>
>> Please investigate and/or mark the test as flaky.
>
> I cannot reproduce the
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 01:13:14PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> It appears the test is flaky, a retry passed:
>
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dlm/unstable/amd64/58083508/
>
> Please investigate and/or mark the test as flaky.
I cannot reproduce the problem locally unfortunately. The on
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 03:55:17PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Source: dlm
> Version: 4.3.0-1
> Please investigate and/or fix the tests.
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dlm/unstable/amd64/57993450/
It appears the test is flaky, a retry passed:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dlm/unst
Source: dlm
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: important
Usertags: util-linux-2.41
Dear udisks2 Maintainers,
your package has autopkgtests, great. However they fail with
util-linux 2.41~rc1 available in experimental. I want to get
util-linux 2.41 into trixie.
Please investigate and/or fix the tests.
Th
9 matches
Mail list logo
