Control: severity -1 wishlist
Jochen Sprickerhof writes ("Re: Bug#1094635: /usr/bin/autopkgtest-virt-unshare:
processes not killed by close"):
> I am not sure here. How should autopkgtest-virt-unshare differentiate
> between processes that it should kill and unrelated
* Ian Jackson [2025-01-30 14:11]:
This bug is a request for autopkgtest-virt-unshare to have the
capacity to kill "escaped" processes, when the testbed is closed.
I think that behaviour would makes sense, perhaps even as a default.
After all, the actual chroot is deleted, so any processes which
Jochen Sprickerhof writes ("Re: Bug#1094635: /usr/bin/autopkgtest-virt-unshare:
processes not killed by close"):
> Note that autopkgtest-virt-unshare does not open some session and the
> unshare syscall only changes the user namespaces for the inside
> processes. Thus running
Hi Ian,
* Ian Jackson [2025-01-29 12:46]:
Steps to reproduce:
With some kind of image tarball bookworm.tar
$ autopkgtest-virt-unshare -t bookworm.tar
ok
open
ok /tmp/autopkgtest.HYR0W4
print-execute-command
Then in another terminal, using that command with the commas
replac
4 matches
Mail list logo
