Bug#1094371: libvigraimpex: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-03 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 help On 2025-01-29 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2025-01-27 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > Is Cmake's > > FIND_PACKAGE(Python COMPONENTS Interpreter Development NumPy) > > supposed to break with Numpy2? > well I can work around this with > -DPython_NumPy_INCLUDE_DIR=$(shell pk

Bug#1094371: libvigraimpex: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-01-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2025-01-27 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2025-01-27 Bas Couwenberg wrote: > > Source: libvigraimpex > > Version: 1.12.1+dfsg-1 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: upstream ftbfs > > Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so > > Control: block 1082237 by -1 > > Your package

Bug#1094371: libvigraimpex: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-01-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2025-01-27 Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Source: libvigraimpex > Version: 1.12.1+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: upstream ftbfs > Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so > Control: block 1082237 by -1 > Dear Maintainer, > Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition

Bug#1094371: libvigraimpex: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-01-27 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Source: libvigraimpex Version: 1.12.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so Control: block 1082237 by -1 Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=l