Bug#109431: Doc-base section hierarchy

2007-12-04 Thread Matthias Julius
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Programming/OCaml would be better than the status quo for me. > > But actually I'm not sure if my case would deserve an even finer > sub-category such as Programming/$language/ApiReference or similar. What > do you think? > > Would it be possible to

Bug#109431: Doc-base section hierarchy (was: Re: doc-base, menu, and policy (Re: Debian Policy 3.7.3.0 uploaded))

2007-12-04 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 11:58:15PM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote: > I fully agree. Even though the newest doc-base tries to map old sections > into new ones while generating control files in > /var/lib/doc-base/documents, I really think that the doc-base and the menu > hierarchies should be separa

Bug#109431: Doc-base section hierarchy (was: Re: doc-base, menu, and policy (Re: Debian Policy 3.7.3.0 uploaded))

2007-12-03 Thread Robert Luberda
Stefano Zacchiroli writes: Hi, On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:24:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: (http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/ch2.html#s2.1). Required field. >> >> I am wondering if when a .doc-base file is not updated, it makes the doc-base 0.8