Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-02-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Actually, enter-tex was already accepted into experimental so I've now uploaded enter-tex to unstable with a 7-day delay and I'm cancelling the earlier delayed latexila upload. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-02-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 11:04:01AM -0500 schrieb Jeremy Bícha: > Control: owner -1 jeremy.bi...@canonical.com > > Also, I'll be uploading a new source package enter-tex to match the > new upstream name as early as today. It will include a transitional > package for latexila. I'll upload to experim

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-02-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: owner -1 jeremy.bi...@canonical.com Also, I'll be uploading a new source package enter-tex to match the new upstream name as early as today. It will include a transitional package for latexila. I'll upload to experimental without delay and just won't upload to Unstable until at least the

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-02-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I have uploaded latexila 3.47.0-1 to the 7-day delayed queue with a change in Maintainer to the Debian GNOME team. I have left Tanguy in Uploaders (in addition to me) and given him Salsa commit rights to the git repo which is now at https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/enter-tex If anyone else nee

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-02-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:44 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging Thank you. I found that page but didn't see the additional sections starting at § 5.12.1. Jeremy Bícha

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-02-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jeremy, Am Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:32:35AM -0500 schrieb Jeremy Bícha: > > 2. You move the package to the GNOME team and add yourself > > > > As far as I understood Hilmar the latter is his prefered solution and > > I'm perfectly happy with this. Since I'm not a member of the GNOME team > >

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-02-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:25 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > I'm fine with both actions: > > 1. Adding you (and anybody else who wants to) to Uploaders of > the package maintained by the Debian TeX maintainers > > 2. You move the package to the GNOME team and add yourself > > A

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-02-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jeremy, I'm fine with both actions: 1. Adding you (and anybody else who wants to) to Uploaders of the package maintained by the Debian TeX maintainers 2. You move the package to the GNOME team and add yourself As far as I understood Hilmar the latter is his prefered solution and I'm

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:03:41AM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preusse: > > As was seen with https://bugs.debian.org/910573 this app is > > maintained upstream by the gedit maintainer who during the past > > year has done multiple soname bumps for the gedit libraries, some > > of which are used by th

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 25.01.25 Jeremy Bícha (jeremy.bi...@canonical.com) wrote: Hello, > As was seen with https://bugs.debian.org/910573 this app is > maintained upstream by the gedit maintainer who during the past > year has done multiple soname bumps for the gedit libraries, some > of which are used by this app t

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 26.01.25 Andreas Tille (ti...@debian.org) wrote: > Am Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:10:50PM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: Hello, > > No, that's fine with me. I just wanted to clarify your > > expectations to our group. As you noticed I've added a few more > > commits to glosstex; we should have don

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Hilmar, Am Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:10:50PM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: > > No, that's fine with me. I just wanted to clarify your expectations to our > group. As you noticed I've added a few more commits to glosstex; we should > have done that before upload... ;-( I confirm it would have pro

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.01.25 23:24, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Hello, Could I be added to Uploaders for latexila and given Salsa permissions for it? My username is jbicha I've sent you an invitation. You should be able yourself do commits to the repo. Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: Open

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Could I be added to Uploaders for latexila and given Salsa permissions for it? My username is jbicha As was seen with https://bugs.debian.org/910573 this app is maintained upstream by the gedit maintainer who during the past year has done multiple soname bumps for the gedit libraries, some of whic

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.01.25 17:49, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, If you do not like those packages in Debian TeX maintainers I can move to Debian Science team (where I care in the same level as described above). No, that's fine with me. I just wanted to clarify your expectations to our group. As you

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Hilmar, Am Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:38:37PM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preusse: > > Now that you created a git repo in our salsa name space and used "Debian TeX > > maintainers " as maintainers address: do > > you expect us to take over maintenance? Or are you going to join us? > > I'm a member of t

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 24.01.25 Hilmar Preuße (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 24.01.25 10:17, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, > > I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila, in accordance with > > the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. > > Your package meets the criteria for

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 24.01.25 10:17, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila, in accordance with the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. Your package meets the criteria for this process, and I would love to assist in preserving and ma

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Source: latexila Version: 3.22.0-1.2 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: 910...@bugs.debian.org, Tanguy Ortolo , Debian TeX maintainers , 829...@bugs.debian.org, 948...@bugs.debian.org, 1079...@bugs.debian.org, наб , Package Salvaging Team Hi, I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila,