Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

2025-01-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 03:23:50PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2025-01-19 14:44, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > You can achieve that with: > > PY3VERS=$(PY3DEF) > > +PY3RANGE=$(shell echo $(PY3DEF) | awk 'BEGIN { FS="." }; { print $$1 > > "." $$2 "-" $$1 "." $$2 + 1 }') > > > > + dh_python3 -

Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

2025-01-19 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2025-01-19 14:44, Colin Watson wrote: You can achieve that with: PY3VERS=$(PY3DEF) +PY3RANGE=$(shell echo $(PY3DEF) | awk 'BEGIN { FS="." }; { print $$1 "." $$2 "-" $$1 "." $$2 + 1 }') + dh_python3 -V $(PY3RANGE) --no-ext-rename # Hack: Do not rename libraries from e.g. vtkClientServerPy

Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

2025-01-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 07:09:57PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > I'd be interested too to know if there's an existing mechanism for > this situation. paraview can't be the only package with python > extensions that can only be built for the default python. > > I'd say we'd want > Depends: python3

Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

2025-01-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #1093278 I'd be interested too to know if there's an existing mechanism for this situation. paraview can't be the only package with python extensions that can only be built for the default python. I'd say we'd want Depends: python3.13 rather than Depends: p

Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

2025-01-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: paraview Version: 5.13.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 python3-paraview https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/paraview Issues preventing migration: ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for paraview/5.13.2+dfsg-1: amd64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference