On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 6:12 AM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-29):
> > I can't believe this just happened.
> >
> > There was no advance warning for the installer team (that I'm aware of),
> > the removal not only removed the package from unstable but also from
> > testing rig
Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-29):
> I can't believe this just happened.
>
> There was no advance warning for the installer team (that I'm aware of),
> the removal not only removed the package from unstable but also from
> testing right afterwards, which just sent the D-I Trixie Alpha 1 preps
> flying
Paul R. Tagliamonte (2024-12-28):
> Last night I was assuming we'd need arch conditional relations to
> avoid breakage.
>
> This morning I realized that is wrong for a few reasons. I dropped the
> tag and I'll process these when I get back to handle more RMs
I can't believe this just happened.
Last night I was assuming we'd need arch conditional relations to avoid
breakage.
This morning I realized that is wrong for a few reasons. I dropped the tag
and I'll process these when I get back to handle more RMs
Paul
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024, 11:30 AM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 09:28:12AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> On second thought I don't think fixing the arch constraints on arch all is
> worth the squeeze.
TTBOMK restricting dependencies to specific archs in Arch: all
packages is not possible in the first place with our current
tooling
tags 1090954 moreinfo
thanks
# Broken Depends:
debian-design: design-desktop-graphics
this package is arch:all so it likely needs an arch constraint; please drop
the moreinfo tag when it's in good shape and i can process this
--
:wq
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: gimp-plugin-regis...@packages.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Control: affects -1 src:gimp-plugin-registry
Control: block 1089850 by -1
Please remove gimp-plugin-registry on s390x at the same time that you
7 matches
Mail list logo
