On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 5:49 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
> Barring more substantial arguments against installing
> appstream by default, I would be inclined to closing this bug as "wontfix".
I see. Well I guess either I just uninstall it then or make a dummy
package to fulfill the "depende
On 2024-10-17 21:30, Philippe Cerfon wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 3:53 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
I'm not sure not issuing tags based on the presence of optional
dependencies is a good idea. I think it would lead to confusion and
output reproducibility problems.
Would that stil
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 3:53 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
> I'm not sure not issuing tags based on the presence of optional
> dependencies is a good idea. I think it would lead to confusion and
> output reproducibility problems.
Would that still be a problem if lintian would just exit
On 2024-10-12 18:02, Philippe Cerfon wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.119.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
May I kindly ask to consider whether it would be possible to have the
appstream package only as an optional dependency?
If installed it also enables integration with apt, which one may or
may n
Package: lintian
Version: 2.119.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
May I kindly ask to consider whether it would be possible to have the
appstream package only as an optional dependency?
If installed it also enables integration with apt, which one may or
may not want.
Maybe it could be made a recommended
5 matches
Mail list logo
