On 2024-10-04 00:14:50, Daniel Swarbrick wrote:
> On 03.10.24 23:21, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
[...]
>> I would also argue *for* vendoring the stuff that's not practical to
>> package. We have a few special precedents in Debian for important
>> packages that have bent the rules a little bit to ship
On 03.10.24 23:21, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
Yeah, I'm kind of hoping they stop doing that already with the v3. But i
will note that people *are* trying to keep up with a lot of modules like
this for other projects, and I think it's actually possible to give it a
try already.
The v3.0.0 uses a tot
On 2024-10-03 22:59:42, Daniel Swarbrick wrote:
> I think you know as well as I do that the likelihood of this being
> feasible is pretty remote.
I know, but i think it's worth, if not trying, at least keeping track of
how and why it's not possible. :)
> The fact that sufficient versions of npm,
Antoine,
I think you know as well as I do that the likelihood of this being
feasible is pretty remote. The fact that sufficient versions of npm,
nodejs and React are already available in Debian does not help much if
the web app uses a ton of bleeding edge modules which are not even on
anybody
Package: prometheus
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
After reading through #1053243, I realized that Alertmanager is not
the only Prom thing that has a "modern" UI buried out of the Debian
package, but that Prometheus itself has a "React" UI available.
And now, checking on the unstable package, I see that
5 matches
Mail list logo
