Hi,
On 16-10-2024 12:24, Simon McVittie wrote:
* gjs is blocked by gnome-shell;
gjs migrated in the mean time.
One thing that might be breaking this (although I don't see any obvious
references to it in britney's log) is that the ftp team removed all of the
binary packages from src:gdm3, not
On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 at 18:45:25 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I think this is mainly waiting for ftp team action (#1082122, #1082389)
The ftp team have now removed the NBS/uninstallable binaries for various
gjs-dependent things from armel.
If I'm reading the excuses correctly, we now have 3 pack
On Sat, 05 Oct 2024 at 00:30:29 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2024-09-20 15:50:52 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > We will also be updating gnome-control-center as part of this transition.
>
> Please go ahead.
A status update, as of 2024-10-09.
These packages have been detected as needing
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2024-09-20 15:50:52 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
>
> We will also be updating gnome-control-center as part of this transition.
>
> Although gjs is not a blocker, we have uploaded the new gjs to
> Unstable and are in the process of getting
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
We will also be updating gnome-control-center as part of this transition.
Although gjs is not a blocker, we have uploaded the new gjs to
Unstable and are in the process of getting the armel binaries removed.
I do not believe we will need **any** extensions removed from
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Control: unblock -1 by 1080521 1079548
GNOME Shell and Mutter 47.0 have been released and are packaged in
Experimental. We are ready to proceed with this transition.
On behalf of the Debian GNOME team,
Jeremy Bícha
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 at 14:16:29 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> - GNOME Shell
This is the only one of the three batches you described that is really
in-scope for #1081519, and I think the only one that really needs a
transition slot from the release team.
> Some things like xwayland scaling won't wo
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 7:15 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> Ideally gnome-settings-daemon would go along with this transition, but it
> has several very flaky build-time tests which cause FTBFS. If they can't
> be fixed soon, a mitigation would be to disable those tests (I suspect
> this is a problem
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
Tags: moreinfo
Control: block -1 by 1080521 1079548
Control: affects -1 + src:gnome-shell src:mutter src:gnome-settings-daemon
src:gnome-remote-desktop
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags
9 matches
Mail list logo
