Bug#1078171: RFS: rsplib/3.4.10-1 -- RSerPool implementation RSPLIB

2024-12-18 Thread Thomas Dreibholz
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi, an updated version is now on the mentors' server: https://mentors.debian.net/package/rsplib/ -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen === Thomas Dreibholz Simula Metro

Bug#1078171: RFS: rsplib/3.4.10-1 -- RSerPool implementation RSPLIB

2024-12-18 Thread Thomas Dreibholz
Hi Phil, rsplib-3.5.0 is now on the mentors' server. Den 12.12.2024 14:25, skrev Phil Wyett: Hi Thomas, Have you had time to make any progress with this submission? Information was requested back in August 2024, with no reply. If no updates are received by the end of January 2025, I will be a

Bug#1078171: RFS: rsplib/3.4.10-1 -- RSerPool implementation RSPLIB

2024-12-13 Thread Thomas Dreibholz
Hi, I am currently preparing the 3.5.0 release. The only missing part is the installation issue of the systemd service files (currently in /lib). This needs a bit more testing, but there should be an update of the package on mentors within the next hours. Am 12.12.2024 um 14:25 schrieb Phil

Bug#1078171: RFS: rsplib/3.4.10-1 -- RSerPool implementation RSPLIB

2024-12-12 Thread Phil Wyett
Thomas, I will do an updated basic review here for your information. Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to

Bug#1078171: RFS: rsplib/3.4.10-1 -- RSerPool implementation RSPLIB

2024-12-12 Thread Phil Wyett
Hi Thomas, Have you had time to make any progress with this submission? Information was requested back in August 2024, with no reply. If no updates are received by the end of January 2025, I will be asking you to remove the submission until such a time you have time to work on the package and be

Bug#1078171: RFS: rsplib/3.4.10-1 -- RSerPool implementation RSPLIB

2024-08-07 Thread Phil Wyett
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Hi Thomas, We seem to be missing the historical 'debian/changelog' data amongst other things. I would suggest taking this package back at this time and re- submitting once a full review and changes have been made. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own