On Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:40:18 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > The other question is if we want to (temporarily) kick out the
> > separate package from testing when it doesn't contain a newer version
> > than the bundled one?
> Equal (upstream) versions between perl and the separate dual life packages
>
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 11:11:39PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Aug 2024 14:33:05 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> > (Somewhat amusingly the json_pp version in the perl 5.40 package warns
> > as well, as it's an identical copy of this one. I'll file a separate bug
> > about that. The iss
On Tue, 06 Aug 2024 14:33:05 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> (Somewhat amusingly the json_pp version in the perl 5.40 package warns
> as well, as it's an identical copy of this one. I'll file a separate bug
> about that. The issue needs to be fixed in both packages, and preferrably
> in the separate li
Package: libjson-pp-perl
Version: 4.16000-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.40-transition
Forwarded: https://github.com/makamaka/JSON-PP/issues/88
The json_pp script in this package warns with newer versions
of Getopt-Long, including the code bundled with Perl
4 matches
Mail list logo
