On 2024-08-14 21:05:28 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Sorry for the delay.
No worries, thank you for handling it.
> I've just flagged the bugfix upload for acceptance into p-u. If you'd
> like to look at 3.0.14 as well, please open a new bug for that. If it
> makes any difference, the window f
On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 17:47 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-07-05 23:32:13 [+0200], To sub...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
> > In the meantime the patch, that broke it, was reverted and this
> > change is part of 3.0.14. I didn't propose 3.0.14 for Bookworm
> > because it was close to t
On 2024-07-05 23:32:13 [+0200], To sub...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
> In the meantime the patch, that broke it, was reverted and this change
> is part of 3.0.14. I didn't propose 3.0.14 for Bookworm because it was
> close to the point release. (This change is also part of 3.2.2 release
> in unstable.)
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openssl
X-Debbugs-Cc: open...@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: bookworm
Severity: normal
Well. There was a bug against openssl in unstable (and according to the
bug report I filled it against 3
4 matches
Mail list logo
