Bug#1074795: python3-distributed: module version reported as "0+unknown"

Hi Étienne, On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 10:36:07PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Julian, > [...] > > Thank you for the hint, it has been very helpful to resolve the > versionning issue. It took me some time to get back to > dask.distributed as I had to carefully manage my energy and > needed to

Bug#1074795: python3-distributed: module version reported as "0+unknown"

Hi Julian, Julian Gilbey, on 2024-07-05: > Ah! Have a look at what I used to do with debugpy (version 1.8.0+ds-* > for example): I deleted _version.py from the source file (in > debian/copyright) and reintroduced it via a patch > (pypi-version.patch), taking the _version.py file from the PyPI > d

Bug#1074795: python3-distributed: module version reported as "0+unknown"

On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Julian Gilbey, on 2024-07-03: > > Is there any chance that setting SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION would > > help? > > Thanks for the hint, it sounded worth a try and I started a > build, including in d/rules: > >

Bug#1074795: python3-distributed: module version reported as "0+unknown"

Hi Julian, Julian Gilbey, on 2024-07-03: > Is there any chance that setting SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION would > help? Thanks for the hint, it sounded worth a try and I started a build, including in d/rules: include /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk export SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERS

Bug#1074795: python3-distributed: module version reported as "0+unknown"

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for your report! > [...] > > Now to make sense how to reroute the package version number to > the version module, instead of having to rely on a git tag. The > problem durin

Bug#1074795: python3-distributed: module version reported as "0+unknown"

Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi Martin, Thanks for your report! Martin Knopp, on 2024-07-03: > the module version reported by pip list (and contained within > /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/distributed/_version.py) is "0+unknown" while > the package itself is "2024.5.2+ds.1-2". This causes unnec

Bug#1074795: python3-distributed: module version reported as "0+unknown"

Package: python3-distributed Version: 2024.5.2+ds.1-2 Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: martinkn...@gmx.de Dear Maintainer, the module version reported by pip list (and contained within /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/distributed/_version.py) is "0+unknown" while the package itself is "2024.5.2+ds.1-