Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-06-12 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-06-11 16:53, Timo Röhling wrote: Hi, I gave it a bit of thought and tightened the dependency from python3-nanobind on nanobind-dev, so both packages will be installed with the same version. I also added a pydist override so that python3-nanobind will automatically emit a versioned dep

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-06-11 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi, * Francesco Ballarin [2024-06-11 09:53]: Hopefully there won't be future ABI breaks that aren't aligned with a fenics-basix/fenics-dolfinx release, but if there will be we will look forward to any suggestion from you on how to come up with a more elegant solution. I gave it a bit of thought

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-06-11 Thread Francesco Ballarin
Source: fenics-dolfinx Followup-For: Bug #1072183 X-Debbugs-Cc: francesco.balla...@unicatt.it, roehl...@debian.org, dpars...@debian.org Thanks Timo. I confirm that nanobind, fenics-basix and fenics-dolfinx migrated yesterday to testing. Hopefully there won't be future ABI breaks that aren't align

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-06-07 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi Francesco, * Francesco Ballarin [2024-06-06 10:51]: Can you try adding the following Breaks to python3-nanobind = Breaks: python3-basix (<< 0.8.0-3), python3-dolfinx (<< 1:0.8.0-8) python3-dolfinx-real (<< 1:0.8.0-8) python3-dolfinx-complex (<< 1:0.8.0-8) ===

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-06-06 Thread Francesco Ballarin
Source: fenics-dolfinx Version: 1:0.8.0-6 Followup-For: Bug #1072183 X-Debbugs-Cc: francesco.balla...@unicatt.it, roehl...@debian.org, Hi Timo, we are having issues making fenics-basix and fenics-dolfinx migrate to testing. The issue is that the two downstream packages basix and dolfinx need to be

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-05-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, I'm attaching a patch that applies cleanly. I'm testing the build G. On Wed, 29 May 2024 23:31:23 +0200 =?utf-8?q?Timo_R=C3=B6hling?= wrote: Source: fenics-dolfinx Version: 1:0.8.0-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch Dear maintainer, upgrading to nanobind 2.0 made your package FTBFS. I a

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-05-29 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: fenics-dolfinx Version: 1:0.8.0-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, upgrading to nanobind 2.0 made your package FTBFS. I am sorry that I did not check this before uploading to unstable, that is on me. I have seen that Frances