On 13/05/2024 17:42, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:04 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Why is there a libsnappy1v5 transitional package?
Serves several purposes. As noted, upstream soname is _not_ changed,
so I can't let the old library package be present as it wo
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:04 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Why is there a libsnappy1v5 transitional package?
Serves several purposes. As noted, upstream soname is _not_ changed,
so I can't let the old library package be present as it would contain
the same named library file conflicting with
On 12/05/2024 11:36, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: affects -1 + src:snappy
Hi RMs,
Upstream of snappy changed function signatures [1] breaking other
applications with the 1.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: affects -1 + src:snappy
Hi RMs,
Upstream of snappy changed function signatures [1] breaking other
applications with the 1.2.0 release. I've added back the original
function sign
4 matches
Mail list logo
