Bug#1070852: transition: gdal *removed* libgdal34

2024-06-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 6/4/24 8:46 AM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: (Manually) upgrading the spdep and spatial R packages failed, for lack of libgdal.so.34, which *was* installed on my system. The r-cran-sf & r-cran-terra Debian packages have been rebuilt to depend on the libgdal35, you'll need to do the same with

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal *removed* libgdal34

2024-06-03 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: libgdal35 Version: 3.9.0+dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #1070852 Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? (Manually) upgrading the spdep and spatial R packages failed, for lack of libgdal.so.34, which *

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-25 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 5/24/24 11:46 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 5/24/24 11:29 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 24/05/2024 11:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 5/24/24 9:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: If that's the case, gdal should probably break older versions of libgdal-grass so that that c

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:29:46AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 24/05/2024 11:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > On 5/24/24 9:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > If that's the case, gdal should probably break older versions of > > > libgdal-grass so that that combination is no

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 5/24/24 11:29 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 24/05/2024 11:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 5/24/24 9:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: If that's the case, gdal should probably break older versions of libgdal-grass so that that combination is not possible. That will also make br

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 24/05/2024 11:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 5/24/24 9:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: If that's the case, gdal should probably break older versions of libgdal-grass so that that combination is not possible. That will also make britney happy, otherwise it will block gdal due to the

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 5/24/24 9:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: If that's the case, gdal should probably break older versions of libgdal-grass so that that combination is not possible. That will also make britney happy, otherwise it will block gdal due to the test regression. gdal, grass, and libgdal-grass

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/05/2024 21:25, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 5/22/24 8:40 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Go ahead. Thanks. gdal (3.9.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now built & installed on all release architectures. binNMUs scheduled. libdal-grass autopkgtests are failing for th

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-22 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 5/22/24 8:40 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Go ahead. Thanks. gdal (3.9.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now built & installed on all release architectures. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E8

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 10/05/2024 16:09, Bas Couwenberg wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:gdal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.

Bug#1070852: transition: gdal

2024-05-10 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:gdal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html For the Debian GIS team I'd like to