On 2024-02-29 20:37:25 [-0800], Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is definitely not the behavior we want. However, the good thing is
> that the dependency from coreutils to libssl is new since bookworm. As a
> result, while this can affect users on upgrades from testing, it will not
> affect upgrades
Hey.
On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 20:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Thanks for this report.
Another case:
Removing libreadline8:amd64 (8.2-3+b1) ...
awk: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.8: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
awk: error while loading shared
Thanks for this report.
This is definitely not the behavior we want. However, the good thing is
that the dependency from coreutils to libssl is new since bookworm. As a
result, while this can affect users on upgrades from testing, it will not
affect upgrades from bookworm because libssl3t64 will
Package: libssl3t64
Version: 3.1.5-1.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: vor...@debian.org
Hey there.
Just a friendly meant heads up:
I saw another case similar to #1065017, i.e. where during the t64 transition.
a library is missing while sort (which I think is also considered essential?) is
execu
4 matches
Mail list logo
