On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 14:55, James Addison wrote:
> If time allows, please could someone from the debian-astro team review
> these two patches for src:astroplan?
Last call for any reviewers/uploaders to inspect these changes to make
python-astroplan-doc reproducible for Debian trixie:
* Bug:
Hello,
If time allows, please could someone from the debian-astro team review
these two patches for src:astroplan?
Each patch modifies an individual Sphinx configuration setting in the
library's documentation structure, and in combination the patches
allow the documentation package to build repro
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
Please find attached a pair of patches to address the remaining
reproducibility issues in python-astroplan-doc.
The second patch ('sphinx-matplotlib-ext-reproducible.patch') requires
version 3.10 of matplotlib, a version that has recently been uploaded
to
Followup-For: Bug #1064858
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:53:13 +, I wrote:
> Merge request opened; it appears that there is one more reproducibiliy issue
> remaining in the SVG output from matplotlib: the ID generation scheme for
> some clipPath elements varies between builds. Some further investiga
Followup-For: Bug #1064858
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-astro-team/astroplan/-/merge_requests/2
Merge request opened; it appears that there is one more reproducibiliy issue
remaining in the SVG output from matplotlib: the ID generation scheme for
some clipPath elements va
Package: python-astroplan-doc
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps randomness
Dear Maintainer,
I'm an occasional volunteer contributor to the Reproducible Builds[1] project,
and noticed recently that the python-astroplan-doc package failed[2] a
6 matches
Mail list logo
