On Mar 09, ca...@allfreemail.net wrote:
> I believe the fix is incomplete, because both /usr/bin/lsmod and
> /usr/sbin/lsmod are still being created.
Actually it has been this way at least since Debian 7.
I will not break compatibility for no good reason.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descripti
Package: kmod
Version: 32-1
Followup-For: Bug #1064798
I believe the fix is incomplete, because both /usr/bin/lsmod and
/usr/sbin/lsmod are still being created.
This is likely the result of kmod.links having both:
/usr/bin/kmod /usr/sbin/lsmod
/usr/bin/kmod /usr/bin/lsmod
and so one of those two
On Feb 26, ca...@allfreemail.net wrote:
> This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are
> merged into a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink
> to bin. Such a filesystem layout has become standard on some
> distributions now, and others are moving onto i
Package: kmod
Version: 31+20240202-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
your package installs the filename `lsmod` to both bin and sbin as opposed to
just one of those locations.
This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into
a single real directory, typically b
4 matches
Mail list logo
