21.02.2024 12:03, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
...
Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind, and already prepared the very same
changes
locally in the package git repository.
> I think the ideal way forward would be to upload to experimental asap to
check it builds and to let Helmu
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 21:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 21.02.2024 11:26, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > I have prepared another patch on top of what is in experimental now
> (attached as nmu_samba.debdiff), does it look better?
> >
> > I have also prepared a patch on top of what is currently in
21.02.2024 11:26, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
I have prepared another patch on top of what is in experimental now (attached
as nmu_samba.debdiff), does it look better?
I have also prepared a patch on top of what is currently in unstable, attached
as nmu_samba_unstable.debdiff.
It's named nmu
I have prepared another patch on top of what is in experimental now
(attached as nmu_samba.debdiff), does it look better?
I have also prepared a patch on top of what is currently in unstable,
attached as nmu_samba_unstable.debdiff.
I think the ideal way forward would be to upload to experimental
20.02.2024 10:30, Andrew Bartlett :
Kia Ora Steve,
So long since we had a chance to work together, and I thank you for your work
on Debian.
Can we have a chat about this?
sssd does not, as I read it, use any time_t relevant parts of ldb, and is the
only external user of LDB in Debian that we
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 10:52 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 20.02.2024 09:30, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Source: sambaVersion: 2:4.20.0~rc2+dfsg-1Severity: importantTags:
> > patch pending sid trixieUser: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: time-t
>
> -Package: libsmbclient+Package: libsmbcli
Kia Ora Steve,
So long since we had a chance to work together, and I thank you for
your work on Debian.
Can we have a chat about this?
sssd does not, as I read it, use any time_t relevant parts of ldb, and
is the only external user of LDB in Debian that we know of.
Also, the debdiff changes the des
Control: tag -1 - patch pending
One more note: samba package in experimental is *not* yet intended for unstable,
it is a pre-release of next samba version and I don't plan to upload it to
unstable
yet. If any work is needed, it should be done on top of 4.19. But I'm not sure
how to coordinate
20.02.2024 09:30, Steve Langasek wrote:
Source: samba
Version: 2:4.20.0~rc2+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
-Package: libsmbclient
+Package: libsmbclient0
Well. Maybe this is ok. I still haven't seen samba-libs ana
Source: samba
Version: 2:4.20.0~rc2+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
archite
10 matches
Mail list logo
