On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 07:57, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
> On 3/26/24 22:47, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2024-02-16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >> debian/patches/qemu/efi-secure-boot.patch is not a good approach to
> >> enabling secure boot with U-Boot. Variables entered via the command li
On 3/26/24 22:47, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On 2024-02-16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
debian/patches/qemu/efi-secure-boot.patch is not a good approach to
enabling secure boot with U-Boot. Variables entered via the command line
containing the security database will be stored on file but will not b
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:57:13 +0100 Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
> Package: u-boot-qemu
> Version: 2024.01+dfsg-1
> Severity: normal
>
> debian/patches/qemu/efi-secure-boot.patch is not a good approach to
> enabling secure boot with U-Boot. Variables entered via the command
line
> containing the s
On 2024-02-16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> debian/patches/qemu/efi-secure-boot.patch is not a good approach to
> enabling secure boot with U-Boot. Variables entered via the command line
> containing the security database will be stored on file but will not be
> loaded into U-Boot on the next bo
Package: u-boot-qemu
Version: 2024.01+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
debian/patches/qemu/efi-secure-boot.patch is not a good approach to
enabling secure boot with U-Boot. Variables entered via the command line
containing the security database will be stored on file but will not be
loaded into U-Boot
5 matches
Mail list logo