Source: bctoolbox
Dear maintainer,
Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t
transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable.
Note that this adds a versioned build-dependency on dpkg-dev, to guard
against accidental backports with a wrong ABI.
Thanks!
-- System In
X-Debbugs-CC: Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:55:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I presume the need for "close together in time" is to prevent
> > interoperability issues from cropping up in unstable between shared
> > library versions on different sides of the time_t transition.
Hi Dennis,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 06:36:24PM +0100, Dennis Filder wrote:
> X-Debbugs-CC: Steve Langasek
> The packages bctoolbox, belle-sip and linphone have been marked as
> affected by the 64-bit time_t transition. However, all these packages
> currently have new versions staged in experimen
X-Debbugs-CC: Steve Langasek
The packages bctoolbox, belle-sip and linphone have been marked as
affected by the 64-bit time_t transition. However, all these packages
currently have new versions staged in experimental because their
library packages had soname bumps unrelated to the 64-bit time_t
Source: bctoolbox
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition r
5 matches
Mail list logo
