Bug#1062956: sysprof: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 at 11:19:48 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > This unconditional use of restrict seems like a bug, I'll report it > upstream. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/issues/114, fix proposed in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/merge_requests/88. smcv

Bug#1062956: sysprof: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Control: tags -1 + wontfix On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 at 02:10:45 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > +sysprof (46~beta-1.1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium > + > + * Non-maintainer upload. > + * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. I'm pretty sure this one is actually unnecessary... > --- sys

Bug#1062956: sysprof: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Please find attached an updated patch rebased on current unstable. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ sl

Bug#1062956: sysprof: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Source: sysprof Version: 45.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid trixie Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet! Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition requ