On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:38:06PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Well, the title of this bug is "NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
> transition", and the bug description said:
> "we have identified libcomps as a source package shipping runtime
> libraries whose ABI either is affected by the change in siz
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:12, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:38:06PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Well, the title of this bug is "NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
> > transition", and the bug description said:
>
> > "we have identified libcomps as a source package shipping runti
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 22:40, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:38:06PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 08:05:52PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:25:17PM +, Luc
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:38:06PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 08:05:52PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:25:17PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > Control: tags -1 -pending
> > > > Con
Control: close -1
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 08:05:52PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:25:17PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 -pending
> > > Control: close -1
> > [...]
> > > There are no mentions o
Control: reopen -1
Revisiting this because somehow I didn't receive the original bug closure
email, and overlooked the contents of the explanation.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 08:05:52PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:25:17PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Control: tags -1
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:31:21AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, these packages will be garbage collected from experimental upon the
> next upload of a package to unstable or experimental with a higher version;
which might happen next month or next year or in 2027...
> so this is a low pri
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 08:05:52PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:25:17PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 -pending
> > Control: close -1
> [...]
> > There are no mentions of 'time_t' in the public headers of this
> > library. The logs shows that it's a fal
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:25:17PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -pending
> Control: close -1
[...]
> There are no mentions of 'time_t' in the public headers of this
> library. The logs shows that it's a false positive, as the automated
> tool simply wasn't able to build it:
[...]
Control: tags -1 -pending
Control: close -1
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 21:02:50 + Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Source: libcomps
> Version: 0.1.19-2.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch pending
> Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: time-t
>
> Dear mai
Source: libcomps
Version: 0.1.19-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
(https://wi
11 matches
Mail list logo
