licenserecon's reporting GPL-3 vs GPL-3+ as a difference
is not a misleading false positive. They are different licenses.
The latter confers the right to use a later license, the former does not.
kitty's d/copyright file should have a separate file stanza for the
GPL-3 (only) files.
See https:/
Package: licenserecon
Version: 1.4
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear Maintainer,
licenserecon currently reports GPL-3 (from licensecheck) vs GPL-3+ (from
d/copyright) as a difference, which is misleading and drowns out the
rest of the output.
For example, bel
2 matches
Mail list logo
