Is the use case of uniform styling via qt[56]ct not considered here? With
current conflicts I can make either Qt5 or Qt6 apps look decent and more or
less uniform with GTK Arc. Removing Qt5 kvantum will leave a big portion of
apps plain ugly.
Hi,
在 2025-04-20日的 15:52 -0300，Leandro Cunha写道：
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 12:02 PM ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 07:55:34PM +0200, Macy Lin wrote:
> > > Do we still need to have both qt5-style-kvantum and kvantum packages?
> > > Or we can remove qt5-style-kvantum
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 12:02 PM ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 07:55:34PM +0200, Macy Lin wrote:
> > Do we still need to have both qt5-style-kvantum and kvantum packages?
> > Or we can remove qt5-style-kvantum to solve the undeclared file conflicts?
>
> materia-kde, and a
There are still lots of Qt5 apps in Debian. Qt5 style is still needed.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 07:55:34PM +0200, Macy Lin wrote:
> Do we still need to have both qt5-style-kvantum and kvantum packages?
> Or we can remove qt5-style-kvantum to solve the undeclared file conflicts?
materia-kde, and arc-kde still depend on qt5-style-kvantum, we need to
migrate them first s
Source: qt5-style-kvantum
Version: 1.0.10-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear maintainers,
As apps inside Debian migrate from Qt 5 to Qt 6, I noticed that my theme
configuration stopped working due to missing theme engines on Qt 6.
Kvantum already supports Qt 6, though it's currently a comp
6 matches
Mail list logo
