Hi Bas
On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 16:16, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> FWIW, all except two hopelessly broken packages now have patches to use
> cython3-legacy for the time being.
Thanks for your work on this!
Regards
Graham
Hi,
Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 02:56:57PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> For reference, there are still quite a number of packages (84
> unclassified, right now) [1], that FTBFS with cython 3.0.
>
> [1]
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=cython3;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
For reference, there are still quite a number of packages (84
unclassified, right now) [1], that FTBFS with cython 3.0.
[1]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=cython3;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I agree with Bas that it would be helpful to move cython 3.0 to unstable
since I have the impression to see the same type of Python3.12 build
errors in several Debian Med packages.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
4 matches
Mail list logo