Bug#1055454: spamassassin: Spamassassin in Bookworm dropped SysVinit script

2023-11-19 Thread Patrik Schindler
Hello, Am 19.11.2023 um 17:52 schrieb Noah Meyerhans : > Hi Patrik. I apologize; I was getting ahead of myself when indicating that > the spamassassin init script is gone by design. It's not, actually. It's > just moved to the spamd package, which was broken out from the base > spamassassin p

Bug#1055454: spamassassin: Spamassassin in Bookworm dropped SysVinit script

2023-11-19 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On 11/6/2023 2:53 PM, Patrik Schindler wrote: The removal of the sysvinit script was intentional. Per Debian policy section 9.3.1, "Packages including a service unit may optionally include an init script to support other init systems". Spamd provides a service unit. There is no requirement to

Bug#1055454: spamassassin: Spamassassin in Bookworm dropped SysVinit script

2023-11-06 Thread Patrik Schindler
Am 06.11.2023 um 19:28 schrieb Noah Meyerhans : > The removal of the sysvinit script was intentional. Per Debian policy > section 9.3.1, "Packages including a service unit may optionally include an > init script to support other init systems". Spamd provides a service unit. > There is no requi

Bug#1055454: spamassassin: Spamassassin in Bookworm dropped SysVinit script

2023-11-06 Thread Noah Meyerhans
Control: tags -1 + wontfix Control: severity -1 wishlist On 11/6/2023 8:41 AM, Patrik Schindler wrote: Surprisingly, after upgrading to Bookworm, the SysVinit script to start spamassassin is no longer there. This renders spamassassin unusable for SysVinit users without manual intervention. Beca

Bug#1055454: spamassassin: Spamassassin in Bookworm dropped SysVinit script

2023-11-06 Thread Patrik Schindler
Package: spamassassin Version: 4.0.0-6 Severity: important Surprisingly, after upgrading to Bookworm, the SysVinit script to start spamassassin is no longer there. This renders spamassassin unusable for SysVinit users without manual intervention. Because SysVinit is still supported in Debian in g