Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2025-03-22 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi John, On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 10:12:52PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi John, > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 09:35:25PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > For those watching

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-11-29 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi John, On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 09:35:25PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi John, > > On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For those watching this bug: John has prepared backports in his tree, > > with both approaches: > > > > https://git

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-08-03 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi John, On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > For those watching this bug: John has prepared backports in his tree, > with both approaches: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor.git/log/?h=debian-two-patch-1780227 > > an

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-05-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sun, 26 May 2024 13:39:07 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > For those watching this bug: John has prepared backports in his tree, > with both approaches: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor.git/log/?h=debian-two-patch-1780227 > > and > > https://g

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-05-26 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, For those watching this bug: John has prepared backports in his tree, with both approaches: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor.git/log/?h=debian-two-patch-1780227 and https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor.git/log/?h=debian-backport-

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-05-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 10:57:03 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi John, > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 12:43:33AM -0800, John Johansen wrote: > > On 12/30/23 20:24, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > > On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:44 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > John, did you had a chance to wor

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-01-28 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi John, On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 12:43:33AM -0800, John Johansen wrote: > On 12/30/23 20:24, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:44 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > John, did you had a chance to work on this backport for 6.1.y stable > > > upstream so we could pick it downs

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-01-28 Thread John Johansen
On 12/30/23 20:24, Mathias Gibbens wrote: On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:44 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: John, did you had a chance to work on this backport for 6.1.y stable upstream so we could pick it downstream in Debian in one of the next stable imports? Cherry-picking 1cf26c3d2c4c ("apparmo

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-01-27 Thread John Johansen
On 1/27/24 01:21, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi John, On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 04:24:47AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:44 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: John, did you had a chance to work on this backport for 6.1.y stable upstream so we could pick it downstream in

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2024-01-27 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi John, On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 04:24:47AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:44 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > John, did you had a chance to work on this backport for 6.1.y stable > > upstream so we could pick it downstream in Debian in one of the next > > stable im

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2023-12-30 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:44 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > John, did you had a chance to work on this backport for 6.1.y stable > upstream so we could pick it downstream in Debian in one of the next > stable imports? Cherry-picking 1cf26c3d2c4c ("apparmor: fix apparmor > mediating locking non

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2023-12-30 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi John, On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:47:45PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:21:02PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:54:17 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > > > On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > > All ci.d.n worke

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2023-12-06 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Paul, On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:21:02PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:54:17 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > > On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from > > > bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopk

Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

2023-12-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:54:17 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote: > All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from > bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopkgtest again in unstable, > testing and stable. We're having issues [1] with the (ba