Hi Emanuele,
On 2023-09-11 12:07, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
On 2023-09-09 08:38, Andrius Merkys wrote:
This is news to me. Could you please point out where in Debian Policy I can
read more about such requirement? I thought I saw packages dropping support
for one or another release architecture with
Hello Andrius,
On 2023-09-09 08:38, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> This is news to me. Could you please point out where in Debian Policy I can
> read more about such requirement? I thought I saw packages dropping support
> for one or another release architecture without being removed from testing.
See h
Hi Emanuele,
On 2023-09-05 16:58, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
On 2023-08-28 07:42, Andrius Merkys wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:29:10 +0200 Emanuele Rocca wrote:
asmjit does not build correctly on the following architectures:
armel, armhf, mips64el, mipsel, s390x.
Does this constitute an RC bug?
Control: retitle -1 asmjit: FTBFS on armel and armhf
Hi Andrius,
On 2023-08-28 07:42, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:29:10 +0200 Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > asmjit does not build correctly on the following architectures:
> > armel, armhf, mips64el, mipsel, s390x.
>
> Does this con
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:29:10 +0200 Emanuele Rocca wrote:
asmjit does not build correctly on the following architectures:
armel, armhf, mips64el, mipsel, s390x.
Does this constitute an RC bug? If not, severity should be lowered.
Thanks,
Andrius
Source: asmjit
Version: 0.0~git20230427.3577608-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
Hi,
asmjit does not build correctly on the following architectures:
armel, armhf, mips64el, mipsel, s390x.
On armel, armhf, and s390x the error is tests-related:
[...]
1: Success:
1: All tests passed
6 matches
Mail list logo
