Bug#1042989: Consider switching packaging to Incus

2023-09-24 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hey there! Just a couple of updates below. Free Ekanayaka writes: >> Of course! The more the merrier! LXD is currently team-maintained >> under the Go Team, although in practice I'm the only one performing >> uploads. I would envision a similar setup for the packaging of Incus, >> and would w

Bug#1042989: Consider switching packaging to Incus

2023-09-19 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hey Mathias, Mathias Gibbens writes: > Hi Free, > > On Fri, 2023-09-15 at 13:22 +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: >> Hello! >> >> as you probably know, the initial fork from: >> >> https://github.com/cyphar/incus/ >> >> has now been moved under the LXC project: >> >> https://github.com/lxc/incus,

Bug#1042989: Consider switching packaging to Incus

2023-09-16 Thread Mathias Gibbens
Hi Free, On Fri, 2023-09-15 at 13:22 +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hello! > > as you probably know, the initial fork from: > > https://github.com/cyphar/incus/ > > has now been moved under the LXC project: > > https://github.com/lxc/incus, > > and has definitely gained traction since the ini

Bug#1042989: Consider switching packaging to Incus

2023-09-15 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hello! as you probably know, the initial fork from: https://github.com/cyphar/incus/ has now been moved under the LXC project: https://github.com/lxc/incus, and has definitely gained traction since the initial announcement, getting support both from the community and from LXD developers that h

Bug#1042989: Consider switching packaging to Incus

2023-08-03 Thread Mathias Gibbens
Package: lxd Severity: important Recently a fork of LXD has been announced: https://github.com/cyphar/incus/. Depending on how that develops Debian might want to consider switching LXD's packaging to follow the fork. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part