Bug#1041089: thin-provisioning-tools FTBFS with googletest 1.13.0

2024-04-03 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-01-13 10:23:06 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 01:03:17AM +0100, Karsten Kruse wrote: > > Is there something else that needs to be done to get the package back into > > testing? > > Yes, > https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/merge_requests/547 Any news

Bug#1041089: thin-provisioning-tools FTBFS with googletest 1.13.0

2024-01-13 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 01:03:17AM +0100, Karsten Kruse wrote: > Is there something else that needs to be done to get the package back into > testing? Yes, https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/merge_requests/547 Bastian -- If I can have honesty, it's easier to overlook mistakes.

Bug#1041089: thin-provisioning-tools FTBFS with googletest 1.13.0

2024-01-12 Thread Karsten Kruse
Hello, Is there something else that needs to be done to get the package back into testing? My system prints a "missing binary: /usr/sbin/check_cache" at boot time when assembling my lvmcache(7). Thanks, Karsten

Bug#1041089: thin-provisioning-tools FTBFS with googletest 1.13.0

2023-09-22 Thread Michael Prokop
* Adrian Bunk [Fri Jul 14, 2023 at 09:19:31PM +0300]: > Source: thin-provisioning-tools > Version: 0.9.0-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs trixie sid > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/thin-provisioning-tools.html > > ... > In file included from > /usr/src/g

Bug#1041089: thin-provisioning-tools FTBFS with googletest 1.13.0

2023-07-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: thin-provisioning-tools Version: 0.9.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs trixie sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/thin-provisioning-tools.html ... In file included from /usr/src/googletest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-message.h:57, fr