Hello Ahmed, hello Simon,
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
Well, I tried fixing with the attached patch (fix-gir.patch), using the
patched dh_girepository. The resulting gir file (also attached) seems to
reference libharfbuzz.so:
[...]
is that correct ?
Although the attached HarfBu
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 02:06:10AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> is that correct ? Yet the resulting gir1.2-harfbuzz-0.0 package only depends
> on libharfbuzz0b package !
---end quoted text---
I've been mistaken in this part, gir1.2-harfbuzz-0.0 depends on both
libharfbuzz0b & libharfbuzz-gobjec
block 1039498 by 1039714
quit
Well, I tried fixing with the attached patch (fix-gir.patch), using the
patched dh_girepository. The resulting gir file (also attached) seems to
reference libharfbuzz.so:
is that correct ? Yet the resulting gir1.2-harfbuzz-0.0 package only depends
on
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 19:54:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I would guess that this might be because the upstream build system
> is only passing in libharfbuzz_gobject as a positional parameter
> to gnome.generate_gir in the Meson build (and a similar setup in
> Autotools), with libharfbuzz_dep
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 17:00:10 +0200, Thomas Uhle wrote:
> 1. Starting with harfbuzz/5.1.0-1, HarfBuzz-0.0.typelib as well as
>HarfBuzz-0.0.gir do no longer reference libharfbuzz.so.0 although
>449 of the 490 symbols are compiled into libharfbuzz.so.0 and just
>the other 41 symbols are
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: reassign -1 libharfbuzz-dev 5.1.0-1
Control: retitle -1 gir1.2-harfbuzz-0.0: missing dependency on libharfbuzz0b
Control: retitle -2 gobject-introspection: dh_girepository does not fetch all
symbols from GIR files
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023, Tho
6 matches
Mail list logo
