Bug#1035650: elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm

2023-05-10 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Mon 08 May 2023 at 06:00PM -04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > tldr: Dear team, are there any objections to making a team upload using > the dummy package approach? It's what at least two users want, and it > guards against harming relations with upstream Emacs. The existing > state of t

Bug#1035650: elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm

2023-05-08 Thread Max Nikulin
On 09/05/2023 05:00, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: It's what at least two users want Intention of my bug report is to ensure that it was a conscious decision to keep a bit outdated Org version. I hope, only a small part of users will really notice the difference with built-in version. I consider

Bug#1035650: elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm

2023-05-08 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
tldr: Dear team, are there any objections to making a team upload using the dummy package approach? It's what at least two users want, and it guards against harming relations with upstream Emacs. The existing state of things is between useless, embarrassing, and harmful, so let's fix this. Sean

Bug#1035650: elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm

2023-05-07 Thread Maxim Nikulin
On 07/05/2023 20:34, David Bremner wrote: Maxim Nikulin writes: Severity: serious Installing elpa-org package to current Debian testing (bookworm) results in older Org version than Org shipped with Emacs. I consider it as a really bad surprise for people who will upgrade from bullseye when book

Bug#1035650: elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm

2023-05-07 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sun 07 May 2023 at 04:42PM -04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Is there a practical argument against adding versioned Provides to > either emacs-common or emacs-el (as appropriate)? Something like > > Provides: elpa-org (= 9.5.5) > > The idea is that emacs-common (or -el) would replace

Bug#1035650: elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm

2023-05-07 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
David Bremner writes: > Note that by filing this bug with severity serious, you are proposing to > remove elpa-org from bullseye. This might be the right course of action, > I'm not sure. > At this time, this would mean that at least elpa-org-contrib will also be dropped. I don't know if there

Bug#1035650: elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm

2023-05-07 Thread David Bremner
Maxim Nikulin writes: > Package: elpa-org > Version: 9.5.2+dfsh-4 > Severity: serious > > Installing elpa-org package to current Debian testing (bookworm) results > in older Org version than Org shipped with Emacs. I consider it as a > really bad surprise for people who will upgrade from bullse

Bug#1035650: elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm

2023-05-06 Thread Maxim Nikulin
Package: elpa-org Version: 9.5.2+dfsh-4 Severity: serious Installing elpa-org package to current Debian testing (bookworm) results in older Org version than Org shipped with Emacs. I consider it as a really bad surprise for people who will upgrade from bullseye when bookworm becomes stable.