Bug#1035106: grimripper

2023-05-09 Thread matthias . geiger1024
Hi Peter. >'d rather not remove asunder just yet. If I receive a bug report on grimripper, >the first thing I would want to do is run asunder alongside it to compare. > >Also, until grimripper is uploaded we won't know for sure if it will build on >all architectures, >and until I get access to a

Bug#1035106: grimripper

2023-05-08 Thread Peter B
I'm happy to have co-maintainers, but with less than a dozen packages in my list I would hope to be able to keep it in good shape.

Bug#1035106: grimripper

2023-05-08 Thread Peter B
Hi Matthias, I'd rather not remove asunder just yet. If I receive a bug report on grimripper, the first thing I would want to do is run asunder alongside it to compare. Also, until grimripper is uploaded we won't know for sure if it will build on all architectures, and until I get access to a S

Bug#1035106: grimripper

2023-05-08 Thread matthias . geiger1024
Hi all. I actually had this on my to-do list, since I regularly use asunder and was involved in the new upstream for a bit. First of all, thanks for your work on the package, Peter. A few comments: Since asunder is not getting any updates and it relies upon the very much deprecated GTK2 that