Bug#1034087: afl++: Include afl-clang-lto(++) in package

2024-04-16 Thread J . Neuschäfer
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 04:15:15PM +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:47:19 +0200 =?utf-8?q?Jonathan_Neusch=C3=A4fer?= > wrote: > > > Package: afl++ > > Version: 4.04c-3 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hello, > > > > the AFL++ documentation recommends using afl-cla

Bug#1034087: afl++: Include afl-clang-lto(++) in package

2024-04-15 Thread Arnaud Rebillout
Hello, On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:47:19 +0200 =?utf-8?q?Jonathan_Neusch=C3=A4fer?= wrote: > Package: afl++ > Version: 4.04c-3 > Severity: wishlist > > Hello, > > the AFL++ documentation recommends using afl-clang-lto(++) if possible[1]. > > Based on local tests, "PREFIX=/usr make" will produce

Bug#1034087:

2024-04-03 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hello sir

Bug#1034087: afl++: Include afl-clang-lto(++) in package

2023-04-08 Thread Jonathan Neuschäfer
Package: afl++ Version: 4.04c-3 Severity: wishlist Hello, the AFL++ documentation recommends using afl-clang-lto(++) if possible[1]. Based on local tests, "PREFIX=/usr make" will produce an afl-clang-lto binary, if lld-14 is also installed (which should be the case, according to debian/rules). N