On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 06:44:21PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> I guess I'll drop the transitional packages in an upload to experimental
> >> and see what happens with the pseudo-excuses[1].
> Everything went well, and the transitional packages are no longer in
> testing. :-)
very nice!
> >>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 2023-03-12 14:44 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 03:36:33PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> After taking a closer look, this seems to be all red herring. Sbuild
>> uses apt for resolving the build dependencies, and while apt prefers
>> virtual p
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 03:36:33PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> After taking a closer look, this seems to be all red herring. Sbuild
> uses apt for resolving the build dependencies, and while apt prefers
> virtual packages over real ones, it has no problem to use the virtual
> one (libncurses-dev
On 2023-03-11 11:11 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On 2023-03-11 09:40 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
>> Package: libtinfo-dev
>> Version: 6.4-2
>> Severity: normal
>> user: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
>> usertags: transitional
>>
>> Please drop the transitional
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2023-03-11 09:40 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Package: libtinfo-dev
> Version: 6.4-2
> Severity: normal
> user: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertags: transitional
>
> Please drop the transitional package libtinfo-dev (from the source package
> ncurses) afte
Package: libtinfo-dev
Version: 6.4-2
Severity: normal
user: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: transitional
Please drop the transitional package libtinfo-dev (from the source package
ncurses) after the release of bookworm, it has been released with buster and
bullseye already...
Descr
6 matches
Mail list logo
