On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:40:55 + Luca Boccassi
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:40:19 +0100 Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Also: at least we need to run "bootctl update" on package updates.
>
> Ah good point, completely forgot about this, will send a MR.
https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/
On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:40:19 +0100 Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 12, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> > I think this only makes sense if systemd-boot is actually the
active
> > bootloader, which is why the existing hook scripts also have a
"bootctl
> > is-installed --quiet || exit 0" check.
> I think tha
On Feb 12, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I think this only makes sense if systemd-boot is actually the active
> bootloader, which is why the existing hook scripts also have a "bootctl
> is-installed --quiet || exit 0" check.
I think that you are right, but then we currently have a significant
usability
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: severity -1 + wishlist
Am 12.02.23 um 02:29 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
Package: systemd-boot
Version: 252.5-2
Severity: normal
systemd-boot.postinst should create boot loader entries for the
currently installed kernels.
Something like this should work:
for kern
Package: systemd-boot
Version: 252.5-2
Severity: normal
systemd-boot.postinst should create boot loader entries for the
currently installed kernels.
Something like this should work:
for kernel in /boot/vmlinuz-*; do
kernel-install add "${kernel#*/vmlinuz-}" "$kernel"
done
--
ciao,
Marco
s
5 matches
Mail list logo
